GH made But is it art? blue, green, light green in 2003 and included the artwork in But is it art? at the The Cross Art Projects, Sydney, in 2003. But is it art? blue, green, light green is one of five in the limited edition But is it art?. The artwork's medium includes Acrylic and lead pencil on linen; watercolour and lead pencil on paper (framed), measuring, overall, Alternate setup arrangements with different resulting measurements. But is it art? blue, green, light green is in a private collection: Melbourne, 2004.
ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF ART THAT IS PRESENT, BUT MISSING
‘But is it art?’ asked the Art Judge with a penetrating stare that scrutinised this page. ‘Well it was some moments ago before three of its circles went missing’, replied the Art Defence somewhat distractedly while desperately looking under books and chairs for the missing circles. ‘We’ve put ‘wanted’ posters up – with a reward. So if you don’t mind waiting a little we expect you’ll soon be able to decide.’
- where someone took down a ‘wanted’ poster to take home and put on their wall as art
- where a mathematician calculated the appropriate reward for the missing circles by summing up the advantages and disadvantages of them being found
- row of watercolour ‘wanted’ posters
- missing light green circle
- missing green circle
- missing blue circle
|07/11/2003||But is it art?, The Cross Art Projects, Sydney|
George Alexander, ‘Primed Suspects: Gail Hastings’ Sculptural Situations’, But is it Art?: Sculptural Situations by Gail Hastings, exhibition catalogue, The Cross Art Projects, Sydney 2003.
Lisa Kelly, ‘If Anything.’, in Gwynneth Porter and Dan Arps (ed.), Natural Selection Magazine, issue 1, 2004, pp.7.1–7.2 http://naturalselection.org.nz/archive/1/1.7_Lisa_Ruark.pdf.
Ruark Lewis, ‘An emailed note concerning an art talk by Gail Hastings’, in Gwynneth Porter and Dan Arps (ed.), Natural Selection Magazine, issue 1, 2004, p.7.3, http://naturalselection.org.nz/archive/1/1.7_Lisa_Ruark.pdf.